“Situation is normal,” Mexican President Plutarco Elías Calles insisted in 1926 — even as churches across Mexico were preparing for the suspension of all public worship. Priests hurried to administer the sacraments and the faithful crowded into parishes for their last public Mass for some time. Baptisms surged, confessions stretched late into the night, and an uneasy urgency settled over Catholic life.
The crisis — soon to erupt into the Cristero War — had been years in the making. The Mexican Constitution of 1917 imposed sweeping anticlerical restrictions: churches were stripped of legal status, religious education was banned, religious orders suppressed, public worship outside churches forbidden, and clergy placed under strict government control.
But Catholics did not simply recede. Among the most organized and consequential lay forces were the Knights of Columbus. Established in Mexico in 1905, the Order had built a nationwide network linking Mexican Catholics not only with one another but with brother Knights in the United States and beyond. That international structure would prove critical in giving voice to the persecuted as the crisis deepened.
Pope Pius XI later recognized that role explicitly in his encyclical Iniquis Afflictisque, published Nov. 18, 1926, in response to the persecution in Mexico: “First of all we mention the Knights of Columbus … made up of active and industrious members who, because of their practical lives and open profession of the Faith, as well as by their zeal in assisting the Church, have brought great honor upon themselves.”
A CHURCH UNDER PRESSURE
By the mid-1920s, varying enforcement of the governmental restrictions gave way to open persecution.
In this tense time, however, the Order in Mexico expanded rapidly as an organized Catholic lay force. From 1918 to 1923, dozens of councils formed, as membership grew from roughly 400 to more than 6,000. Responding to both dire poverty and religious restrictions, the Knights founded and ran dozens of schools, clinics and other charitable works, while supporting clergy as conditions worsened.
Defense of clergy sometimes took on a literal meaning. In February 1921, Archbishop José Mora y del Río’s residence in Mexico City was bombed, prompting the Knights of Columbus to organize a 15-man protective detail.
A decisive turn came in January 1923 at Cubilete Hill (Cerro del Cubilete) in Guanajuato, where the Diocese of León laid the cornerstone for a monument to Christ the King before a crowd of tens of thousands. Archbishop Ernesto Filippi, the pope’s representative to Mexico, presided. Authorities condemned the event as illegal, and two days later Filippi was expelled from the country.
W.F. Buckley Sr.’s March 1923 Columbia article, “What’s Wrong in Mexico?”, reported that Archbishop Filippi believed the real reason for his expulsion was “the growth in Mexico of the Knights of Columbus and the Catholic Daughters of America.” A protest issued by Catholic leaders underscored the scale of the moment: “More than 50,000 Mexicans were there united to proclaim Jesus Christ the King of Mexico.”
This took place two years before Pope Pius XI established the feast of Christ the King for the universal Church — a declaration that would soon take on particular resonance in Mexico.
Recognizing religious liberty as more than a one-organization concern, the Knights expanded their advocacy. For example, then-State Deputy Luis G. Bustos soon organized the Pacto de Honor de las Organizaciones Católicas (Honor Agreement of Catholic Organizations), and in March 1925 helped found the Liga Nacional de la Defensa de la Libertad Religiosa (National League for the Defense of Religious Liberty) with the support of the Order. More than half of its founding members were Knights, and hundreds more served as local officers.
By 1926, enforcement had become systematic under President Calles. In June, the so-called Calles Law introduced penalties that made religious practice legally perilous, with sentences of up to six years in prison.
This was the reality that prompted Mexico’s bishops to take an extraordinary step: On July 31, 1926, public worship ceased nationwide.
The shutdown of public worship did not end Catholic life in Mexico. It forced the crisis into a new, underground phase — and the Knights of Columbus responded in a far more public, coordinated and international way.
THE KNIGHTS RESPOND
Providentially, the 44th Supreme Convention opened in Philadelphia on Aug. 4, 1926, just days after the suspension of services. There, Supreme Knight James Flaherty gave the Order’s response its public voice. “We behold our brothers suffering for their Faith in one of the most violent and unjust religious persecutions of modern times,” he declared. Many Americans argued the persecution was the affair of an independent state. “But we shall not hold our peace,” Flaherty said. “We shall protest against this persecution in the names of humanity and liberty.”
The convention adopted a formal resolution condemning President Calles’ persecution and authorized the raising of $1 million for what became the Mexican Fund — a campaign to educate the public and assist those affected.
The Order quickly carried that campaign beyond the convention hall. In a short time, lectures across the country — sometimes drawing thousands — shed light on the situation. Five million pamphlets were produced and distributed detailing the persecution and its ideology, along with 2 million copies of the bishops’ pastoral on Mexico. Refugees escaping the persecution were aided as well.
On Sept. 1, 1926, Flaherty and other Supreme Officers met with President Calvin Coolidge to discuss the Mexican crisis, helping move the issue from the margins of public concern into the sphere of national policy.
Meanwhile, Columbia’s coverage was sharp enough to have real consequences. The October 1926 issue stated flatly: “The Mexican government cannot stand publicity. In the white light of fact and history, the red of the blood it spills and the ideas it sponsors are revealed as great blots on modern civilization. The Mexican government has, accordingly, forbidden Columbia from Mexico.”


